AuxeiraBack to auxeira.com

Case Study · SmartStart South Africa

The 3.3x SROI that existed in the data for a decade.
Auxeira found it in six weeks.

SmartStart South Africa had been running one of the continent's most effective ECD franchise models since 2015. The economic evidence for its impact had never been assembled. Auxeira built it, and the result became the foundation for a $2M Skoll Award.

3.3x
Verified social return on investment
SROI · Auxeira calculation
152,664
Children reached across the programme
2015 to 2025
$2M
Skoll Award for Social Innovation
2026 · Highest global recognition

The brief

A decade of impact. No economic case.

SmartStart had built something rare: a social franchise model that trained and supported community-based ECD practitioners at scale across South Africa. By 2025, the programme had reached over 152,000 children and generated measurable economic activity across 14,740 enterprises in its value chain. The monitoring data existed. The annual reports existed. The impact was real.

What did not exist was the economic evidence. No SROI had been calculated. No fiscal multiplier had been modelled. No caregiver workforce contribution had been quantified. When SmartStart approached major funders and government co-investment conversations, the evidence gap was the limiting factor. The programme was ready for scale. The evidence was not ready for Treasury.

SmartStart commissioned Auxeira to close that gap. The brief: synthesise a decade of programme data, calculate a defensible SROI, and produce an impact report that could anchor the next phase of institutional funding conversations. Timeline: six weeks.

The methodology

Econometric rigour. Six weeks.

Auxeira applied a multi-method evidence synthesis approach built on three disciplines: longitudinal data analysis, SROI calculation using HACT/SROI Network standards, and the Auxeira Evidence Index for qualitative synthesis at scale.

The quantitative work involved econometric modelling of programme outcomes across the full 2015 to 2025 dataset, regression analysis to isolate programme attribution, and counterfactual economic analysis to establish what would not have happened without SmartStart. Caregiver workforce participation was modelled as an economic contribution, not just a programme output. Fiscal savings to government were quantified using cost-per-outcome benchmarks from comparable public sector delivery.

The qualitative work used the Auxeira Evidence Index: 49 stakeholder interviews coded across a thematic framework, producing 207 indexed quotes that formed the narrative architecture of the report. This is not standard interview synthesis. It is a structured evidence retrieval system that makes qualitative data citable and auditable.

+Longitudinal data synthesis (2015-2025)
+SROI calculation (HACT/SROI Network standards)
+Econometric modelling and causal attribution
+Counterfactual economic analysis
+Caregiver workforce participation modelling
+Fiscal savings quantification
+Evidence Index: 49 interviews, 207 quotes coded
+Narrative architecture for funder audiences

Key findings

What the data showed.

3.3x
Social return on investment
For every rand invested in SmartStart, R3.30 in verified social and economic value was generated.
152,664
Children reached
Across the full programme period, 2015 to 2025, in underserved communities across South Africa.
14,740
Enterprises surfaced
Across the SmartStart value chain: practitioners, suppliers, and community economic activity generated by the programme.
R18M+
Unmeasured economic contribution
Caregiver workforce participation and practitioner income that had never been quantified before this engagement.
207
Indexed evidence quotes
Coded across 49 stakeholder interviews using the Auxeira Evidence Index, a citable, auditable qualitative evidence base.
6 weeks
Delivery timeline
From commission to completed report, including full SROI calculation, econometric modelling, and narrative architecture.

The Skoll Award

Evidence that travels to the highest rooms.

In 2026, SmartStart South Africa received the Skoll Award for Social Innovation, a $2M recognition from the Skoll Foundation, the highest honour in global social entrepreneurship. The award recognised SmartStart's decade of impact in early childhood development across South Africa.

The Auxeira 10-year impact report was the evidence foundation for that nomination. The 3.3x SROI, the fiscal savings quantification, the caregiver economic contribution analysis: these were not decorative additions to a strong programme. They were the economic case that made SmartStart's impact legible to a global funder audience that requires fiscal evidence before it commits at scale.

The Skoll Award positions SmartStart for government co-investment conversations at a level that was not previously accessible. The evidence architecture Auxeira built is now the platform for that next phase. This is what impact evaluation ECD work looks like when it is done at the level of economic evidence, not just programme monitoring.

What this means for your organisation

The SmartStart situation is not unique.

Across South Africa's ECD, education foundation, and social franchise sector, the pattern repeats: strong programmes, real impact, and an evidence base that stops at monitoring data. The SROI exists in the numbers. The fiscal multiplier is there. The caregiver economic contribution is real. It has simply never been assembled into the language that moves Treasury, unlocks co-investment, and positions organisations for the next phase of scale.

Auxeira's evidence synthesis methodology, the same approach applied to SmartStart, is available to organisations with five or more years of programme data and a funding conversation that requires economic evidence. The work takes six to fourteen weeks. The output is a citable, auditable economic case that travels into rooms that monitoring reports cannot reach.

If your organisation has built something real and the evidence has not caught up with the impact, that is the gap Auxeira closes.

Ready to find your SROI?

Start with a conversation or take the Evidence Health Check to see where your organisation's evidence stands today.